9 – Guide to Disconnecting the DCIA

Stormwater BMP Series
DCIA, CN Methods & BMPFast Modeling

DCIA Definition, Curve Number Methods, and BMPFast Project Modeling

Stormwater BMP Training Series  |  Applicant’s Handbook Vol. 1, 2024  |  Topics: DCIA Standards, CN Infiltration, Composite CN, BMPFast Setup & Results


1 · DCIA Definition & Standards

Topic 1  ·  Source slides 1, 2, 3  ·  Applicant’s Handbook Vol. 1, 2024

Core Definition

Directly Connected Impervious Area (DCIA) consists of impervious surfaces whose stormwater runoff drains directly to a conveyance system — with no intervening pervious buffer capable of providing meaningful infiltration or flow attenuation.

What Qualifies as Non-DCIA?

An impervious surface may be classified as non-DCIA (i.e., “disconnected”) when runoff passes across a pervious strip before reaching a conveyance. The minimum required pervious flow path depends on the Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) of the receiving soil:

Disconnection Standard — HSG A & B Soils

A minimum 10-foot pervious flow path is required to classify the upstream impervious area as non-DCIA when the receiving soil is Hydrologic Soil Group A or B.

Disconnection Standard — HSG C & D Soils

A minimum 20-foot pervious flow path is required for soils classified as HSG C or D, reflecting their lower infiltration capacity.

Demonstrating a Narrower Width

The Applicant’s Handbook allows a site-specific demonstration that a pervious strip narrower than the default distance is sufficient to achieve disconnection. This analysis must be conducted using the 3-year / 1-hour design storm and must show that the pervious buffer fully infiltrates or substantially attenuates runoff from the contributing impervious area under those conditions.

Regulatory Source

All DCIA disconnection standards in this module are sourced from the Applicant’s Handbook, Volume 1 (2024 edition), the primary stormwater permitting guidance document in Florida.


2 · CN Method & Soil Infiltration

Topic 2  ·  Source slides 2, 4, 7, 10  ·  SCS/NRCS Curve Number methodology

The S′ Storage Equation

The SCS/NRCS Curve Number (CN) method quantifies the maximum potential soil storage using the following relationship:

Storage Formula

S′ = (1000 / CN) − 10
where S′ is the maximum potential storage in inches. A lower CN indicates a more permeable soil with greater storage capacity; a higher CN indicates less storage and greater runoff potential.

CN Values and Storage Capacity by Soil Type

The table below illustrates how CN values translate into storage depth and runoff behavior across representative soil types and land covers:

Land Cover / Soil Type HSG CN Value S′ Storage (inches) Notes
Open/Sandy soils, good cover A 50 10.00 High infiltration; large storage
Moderate-permeability soils C 78 2.82 Limited storage; more runoff
Impervious surfaces 95 0.53 Runoff begins at only 0.1 in. abstraction
Compacted HSG A soil A (compacted) ~55 ~8.18 ~10% CN increase due to compaction
Table 1 — Representative CN values and calculated S′ storage depths. Impervious surfaces use CN=95 per SCS standards; runoff is initiated after only 0.1 inch of initial abstraction.

Key CN Behavior Notes

  • CN = 95 is the standard value applied to impervious surfaces. With such a high CN, runoff generation begins almost immediately — after just 0.1 inch of initial abstraction — meaning virtually all rainfall becomes runoff.
  • A CN of 50 (HSG A soil) stores 10 inches of rainfall before any runoff is generated, making HSG A soils highly effective for stormwater disconnection.
  • Soil compaction from construction activity can raise CN values by approximately 10 percentage points (e.g., CN 50 → CN 55), meaningfully reducing infiltration capacity and increasing runoff volume.
  • For HSG A soils, a 10-foot pervious strip can effectively disconnect approximately 32 feet of contributing impervious width under the design storm criteria.

Critical Requirement

The composite CN for any site must be calculated using a volume-based method, not a simple or area-weighted average. Simple averaging underestimates runoff — sometimes significantly — and is not acceptable for regulatory submissions.


3 · Composite CN Calculation

Topic 3  ·  Source slides 7, 9, 10  ·  Volume-based composite CN methodology

Why Disconnection Affects the Composite CN

When impervious area is disconnected from a conveyance system, its runoff is routed across a pervious buffer. In the CN modeling framework, this changes how the impervious area’s runoff is accounted for — it no longer flows directly to the outlet but instead contributes to the effective CN of the pervious drainage area that receives it. This causes the composite CN of the pervious area to increase, reflecting the combined infiltration demand placed on the soil.

Worked Examples: Disconnecting 1.1 Acres

HSG A Example

83.81

Composite CN after disconnecting 1.1 ac impervious area over HSG A soils

HSG C Example

91.26

Composite CN after disconnecting 1.1 ac impervious area over HSG C soils

Simple Average (Invalid)

86.5

Simple average of CN=78 and CN=95 — underestimates runoff; must not be used

Volume-Based vs. Simple Average: Why It Matters

In the HSG A example above, the correct volume-based composite CN is 83.81. Using a simple area-weighted average of the impervious CN (95) and pervious CN (50) produces 86.5, which appears higher — but this is misleading. The volume-based method properly accounts for the runoff generation dynamics of each cover type; a simple average fails to reflect the actual storm runoff depth and will produce incorrect load estimates.

  • The composite CN is sensitive to the fraction of DCIA: as more impervious area is disconnected, the effective CN of the receiving pervious area rises, capturing the increased hydraulic loading on that soil.
  • The composite CN is also sensitive to pervious area size: a smaller pervious receiving area must absorb the same disconnected runoff and therefore carries a higher effective CN.
  • Regulators and review engineers will reject simple or area-weighted CN averages in ERP submissions — always use the volume-based composite approach.

Modeling Implication

BMPFast and similar tools perform the volume-based composite CN calculation internally — but only if the catchment topology (impervious vs. pervious areas, connections, and BMP routing) is configured correctly. Verify your inputs against the worked examples in the Applicant’s Handbook before relying on model output.


4 · BMPFast Example Project Setup

Topic 4  ·  Source slides 5, 6, 11, 12  ·  BMPFast software configuration walkthrough

Site Parameters

The following example site is used throughout this module to demonstrate BMPFast configuration and results interpretation. All areas and CN values should be confirmed against site-specific soils mapping and impervious cover delineation before use in a permit application.

Total Impervious

1.3 ac

Disconnected (non-DCIA)

1.1 ac

Remaining DCIA

0.2 ac

Pervious Area

0.7 ac

Soil Type

HSG A

CN = 50

BMP Configuration: Rain Garden

Rain Garden Specification

Area: 0.15 acres  |  Media depth: 2 feet  |  Media type: Bold & Gold engineered soil mix. This BMP is placed in series within the catchment to capture outflow from the disconnected impervious area before it reaches the conveyance.

Catchment Topology and BMP Routing

In BMPFast, the catchment topology must be explicitly defined to correctly represent the flow path from each land cover type to the outlet. Key configuration steps include:

  • Define the catchment areas separately: DCIA (0.2 ac), disconnected impervious (1.1 ac), and pervious (0.7 ac) must be entered as distinct contributing areas with their respective CN values.
  • Set the routing topology: The disconnected impervious area routes to the pervious buffer first. The pervious buffer and DCIA both route toward the outlet (or BMP inlet).
  • Assign the BMP to the correct position in series: BMPFast allows multiple BMPs in series within a single catchment. The rain garden should be positioned to receive the combined runoff from the disconnected area before it reaches the surface discharge point.
  • Verify the BMP media properties: Bold & Gold media has defined hydraulic conductivity and nutrient removal characteristics built into BMPFast’s library. Confirm the version matches current Florida Department of Environmental Protection approved specifications.

5 · Results: Disconnecting DCIA Impact

Topic 5  ·  Source slides 13, 14, 15  ·  BMPFast annual runoff and pollutant load outputs

Annual Runoff Volume Reduction

Baseline (All DCIA)

28.24 in/yr

Annual runoff before any disconnection

Disconnected (No BMP)

16.97 in/yr

Annual runoff after disconnecting 1.1 ac

Disconnected + Rain Garden

1.91 in/yr

Annual runoff with 0.15 ac Bold & Gold BMP

Total Nitrogen Load Reduction

TN Load — Baseline

10.27 kg/yr

Total nitrogen before disconnection

TN Load — Disconnected

6.18 kg/yr

TN after disconnecting 1.1 ac (no BMP)

Scenario Comparison Table

Scenario Annual Runoff (in/yr) TN Load (kg/yr) BMAP Target Achievable?
Baseline — all impervious connected (DCIA) 28.24 10.27 Unlikely without BMP
Disconnected — 1.1 ac non-DCIA, no BMP 16.97 6.18 Possible (site-dependent)
Disconnected + Rain Garden (0.15 ac, 2 ft) 1.91 Yes, with BMP
Connected (DCIA) + Rain Garden Yes, with properly sized BMP
Table 2 — BMPFast scenario comparison for the example 2.0 ac site (HSG A, CN=50 pervious). Both connected and disconnected configurations can meet BMAP discharge load targets when paired with an appropriately sized BMP. Disconnection alone may be sufficient depending on the applicable load allocation.

Key Findings and Reporting Metrics

  • Disconnecting 1.1 acres of impervious area reduces annual runoff by approximately 40% (from 28.24 to 16.97 in/yr) on HSG A soils — without any engineered BMP.
  • Adding the 0.15-acre rain garden with Bold & Gold media reduces annual runoff by a further 89% (to 1.91 in/yr), demonstrating the compounding benefit of structural BMPs after disconnection.
  • Total nitrogen load is reduced from 10.27 to 6.18 kg/yr by disconnection alone — a reduction of approximately 40% — which may be sufficient to meet BMAP discharge load targets on some permitted sites.
  • Both the connected-with-BMP and disconnected-with-BMP scenarios can meet performance criteria; the optimal approach depends on site constraints and the applicable load allocation in the BMAP.
  • BMPFast reporting outputs should include surface discharge mass (kg/yr per pollutant) and surface discharge volume (acre-feet/yr or inches/yr) as the primary metrics for permit submittal.

Appendix · Quick-Reference Cards

Summary reference cards for field use, design review, and permit submittal preparation.

Ref Card 1 — DCIA Disconnection Standards

  • HSG A/B: 10 ft minimum pervious flow path
  • HSG C/D: 20 ft minimum pervious flow path
  • Narrower width allowed via 3-yr/1-hr storm analysis
  • Source: Applicant’s Handbook Vol. 1, 2024

Ref Card 2 — CN Storage Formula

  • S′ = (1000/CN) − 10 (inches)
  • CN=50 (HSG A): S′ = 10.00 in
  • CN=78 (HSG C): S′ = 2.82 in
  • CN=95 (Impervious): S′ = 0.53 in
  • Compaction raises CN ~10 pts

Ref Card 3 — Composite CN Rules

  • Always use volume-based composite CN
  • Simple average (e.g., 86.5) underestimates runoff
  • HSG A, 1.1 ac disconnected: CN = 83.81
  • HSG C, 1.1 ac disconnected: CN = 91.26
  • Sensitive to DCIA fraction and pervious area size

Ref Card 4 — Example Site Parameters

  • Total impervious: 1.3 ac
  • Disconnected: 1.1 ac  |  DCIA: 0.2 ac
  • Pervious: 0.7 ac  |  HSG A, CN=50
  • Rain garden: 0.15 ac, 2 ft Bold & Gold media

Ref Card 5 — BMPFast Results Summary

  • Baseline (all DCIA): 28.24 in/yr, 10.27 kg TN/yr
  • Disconnected, no BMP: 16.97 in/yr, 6.18 kg TN/yr
  • Disconnected + rain garden: 1.91 in/yr
  • Report: surface discharge mass & volume

Ref Card 6 — BMPFast Configuration Checklist

  • ☐ Enter DCIA, disconnected, and pervious areas separately
  • ☐ Assign correct CN to each area
  • ☐ Set routing: disconnected → pervious buffer → outlet
  • ☐ Place BMP in series at correct position
  • ☐ Verify BMP media matches approved spec
  • ☐ Run baseline and disconnected scenarios before BMP

DCIA Definition, CN Methods & BMPFast Modeling  |  Stormwater BMP Series
Applicant’s Handbook Vol. 1, 2024  ·  Slides 1–15