9 – Guide to Disconnecting the DCIA
DCIA, CN Methods & BMPFast Modeling
DCIA Definition, Curve Number Methods, and BMPFast Project Modeling
Stormwater BMP Training Series | Applicant’s Handbook Vol. 1, 2024 | Topics: DCIA Standards, CN Infiltration, Composite CN, BMPFast Setup & Results
Contents
1 · DCIA Definition & Standards
Topic 1 · Source slides 1, 2, 3 · Applicant’s Handbook Vol. 1, 2024
Core Definition
Directly Connected Impervious Area (DCIA) consists of impervious surfaces whose stormwater runoff drains directly to a conveyance system — with no intervening pervious buffer capable of providing meaningful infiltration or flow attenuation.
What Qualifies as Non-DCIA?
An impervious surface may be classified as non-DCIA (i.e., “disconnected”) when runoff passes across a pervious strip before reaching a conveyance. The minimum required pervious flow path depends on the Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) of the receiving soil:
Disconnection Standard — HSG A & B Soils
A minimum 10-foot pervious flow path is required to classify the upstream impervious area as non-DCIA when the receiving soil is Hydrologic Soil Group A or B.
Disconnection Standard — HSG C & D Soils
A minimum 20-foot pervious flow path is required for soils classified as HSG C or D, reflecting their lower infiltration capacity.
Demonstrating a Narrower Width
The Applicant’s Handbook allows a site-specific demonstration that a pervious strip narrower than the default distance is sufficient to achieve disconnection. This analysis must be conducted using the 3-year / 1-hour design storm and must show that the pervious buffer fully infiltrates or substantially attenuates runoff from the contributing impervious area under those conditions.
Regulatory Source
All DCIA disconnection standards in this module are sourced from the Applicant’s Handbook, Volume 1 (2024 edition), the primary stormwater permitting guidance document in Florida.
2 · CN Method & Soil Infiltration
Topic 2 · Source slides 2, 4, 7, 10 · SCS/NRCS Curve Number methodology
The S′ Storage Equation
The SCS/NRCS Curve Number (CN) method quantifies the maximum potential soil storage using the following relationship:
Storage Formula
S′ = (1000 / CN) − 10
where S′ is the maximum potential storage in inches. A lower CN indicates a more permeable soil with greater storage capacity; a higher CN indicates less storage and greater runoff potential.
CN Values and Storage Capacity by Soil Type
The table below illustrates how CN values translate into storage depth and runoff behavior across representative soil types and land covers:
| Land Cover / Soil Type | HSG | CN Value | S′ Storage (inches) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open/Sandy soils, good cover | A | 50 | 10.00 | High infiltration; large storage |
| Moderate-permeability soils | C | 78 | 2.82 | Limited storage; more runoff |
| Impervious surfaces | — | 95 | 0.53 | Runoff begins at only 0.1 in. abstraction |
| Compacted HSG A soil | A (compacted) | ~55 | ~8.18 | ~10% CN increase due to compaction |
Key CN Behavior Notes
- CN = 95 is the standard value applied to impervious surfaces. With such a high CN, runoff generation begins almost immediately — after just 0.1 inch of initial abstraction — meaning virtually all rainfall becomes runoff.
- A CN of 50 (HSG A soil) stores 10 inches of rainfall before any runoff is generated, making HSG A soils highly effective for stormwater disconnection.
- Soil compaction from construction activity can raise CN values by approximately 10 percentage points (e.g., CN 50 → CN 55), meaningfully reducing infiltration capacity and increasing runoff volume.
- For HSG A soils, a 10-foot pervious strip can effectively disconnect approximately 32 feet of contributing impervious width under the design storm criteria.
Critical Requirement
The composite CN for any site must be calculated using a volume-based method, not a simple or area-weighted average. Simple averaging underestimates runoff — sometimes significantly — and is not acceptable for regulatory submissions.
3 · Composite CN Calculation
Topic 3 · Source slides 7, 9, 10 · Volume-based composite CN methodology
Why Disconnection Affects the Composite CN
When impervious area is disconnected from a conveyance system, its runoff is routed across a pervious buffer. In the CN modeling framework, this changes how the impervious area’s runoff is accounted for — it no longer flows directly to the outlet but instead contributes to the effective CN of the pervious drainage area that receives it. This causes the composite CN of the pervious area to increase, reflecting the combined infiltration demand placed on the soil.
Worked Examples: Disconnecting 1.1 Acres
HSG A Example
83.81
Composite CN after disconnecting 1.1 ac impervious area over HSG A soils
HSG C Example
91.26
Composite CN after disconnecting 1.1 ac impervious area over HSG C soils
Simple Average (Invalid)
86.5
Simple average of CN=78 and CN=95 — underestimates runoff; must not be used
Volume-Based vs. Simple Average: Why It Matters
In the HSG A example above, the correct volume-based composite CN is 83.81. Using a simple area-weighted average of the impervious CN (95) and pervious CN (50) produces 86.5, which appears higher — but this is misleading. The volume-based method properly accounts for the runoff generation dynamics of each cover type; a simple average fails to reflect the actual storm runoff depth and will produce incorrect load estimates.
- The composite CN is sensitive to the fraction of DCIA: as more impervious area is disconnected, the effective CN of the receiving pervious area rises, capturing the increased hydraulic loading on that soil.
- The composite CN is also sensitive to pervious area size: a smaller pervious receiving area must absorb the same disconnected runoff and therefore carries a higher effective CN.
- Regulators and review engineers will reject simple or area-weighted CN averages in ERP submissions — always use the volume-based composite approach.
Modeling Implication
BMPFast and similar tools perform the volume-based composite CN calculation internally — but only if the catchment topology (impervious vs. pervious areas, connections, and BMP routing) is configured correctly. Verify your inputs against the worked examples in the Applicant’s Handbook before relying on model output.
4 · BMPFast Example Project Setup
Topic 4 · Source slides 5, 6, 11, 12 · BMPFast software configuration walkthrough
Site Parameters
The following example site is used throughout this module to demonstrate BMPFast configuration and results interpretation. All areas and CN values should be confirmed against site-specific soils mapping and impervious cover delineation before use in a permit application.
Total Impervious
1.3 ac
Disconnected (non-DCIA)
1.1 ac
Remaining DCIA
0.2 ac
Pervious Area
0.7 ac
Soil Type
HSG A
CN = 50
BMP Configuration: Rain Garden
Rain Garden Specification
Area: 0.15 acres | Media depth: 2 feet | Media type: Bold & Gold engineered soil mix. This BMP is placed in series within the catchment to capture outflow from the disconnected impervious area before it reaches the conveyance.
Catchment Topology and BMP Routing
In BMPFast, the catchment topology must be explicitly defined to correctly represent the flow path from each land cover type to the outlet. Key configuration steps include:
- Define the catchment areas separately: DCIA (0.2 ac), disconnected impervious (1.1 ac), and pervious (0.7 ac) must be entered as distinct contributing areas with their respective CN values.
- Set the routing topology: The disconnected impervious area routes to the pervious buffer first. The pervious buffer and DCIA both route toward the outlet (or BMP inlet).
- Assign the BMP to the correct position in series: BMPFast allows multiple BMPs in series within a single catchment. The rain garden should be positioned to receive the combined runoff from the disconnected area before it reaches the surface discharge point.
- Verify the BMP media properties: Bold & Gold media has defined hydraulic conductivity and nutrient removal characteristics built into BMPFast’s library. Confirm the version matches current Florida Department of Environmental Protection approved specifications.
5 · Results: Disconnecting DCIA Impact
Topic 5 · Source slides 13, 14, 15 · BMPFast annual runoff and pollutant load outputs
Annual Runoff Volume Reduction
Baseline (All DCIA)
28.24 in/yr
Annual runoff before any disconnection
Disconnected (No BMP)
16.97 in/yr
Annual runoff after disconnecting 1.1 ac
Disconnected + Rain Garden
1.91 in/yr
Annual runoff with 0.15 ac Bold & Gold BMP
Total Nitrogen Load Reduction
TN Load — Baseline
10.27 kg/yr
Total nitrogen before disconnection
TN Load — Disconnected
6.18 kg/yr
TN after disconnecting 1.1 ac (no BMP)
Scenario Comparison Table
| Scenario | Annual Runoff (in/yr) | TN Load (kg/yr) | BMAP Target Achievable? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline — all impervious connected (DCIA) | 28.24 | 10.27 | Unlikely without BMP |
| Disconnected — 1.1 ac non-DCIA, no BMP | 16.97 | 6.18 | Possible (site-dependent) |
| Disconnected + Rain Garden (0.15 ac, 2 ft) | 1.91 | — | Yes, with BMP |
| Connected (DCIA) + Rain Garden | — | — | Yes, with properly sized BMP |
Key Findings and Reporting Metrics
- Disconnecting 1.1 acres of impervious area reduces annual runoff by approximately 40% (from 28.24 to 16.97 in/yr) on HSG A soils — without any engineered BMP.
- Adding the 0.15-acre rain garden with Bold & Gold media reduces annual runoff by a further 89% (to 1.91 in/yr), demonstrating the compounding benefit of structural BMPs after disconnection.
- Total nitrogen load is reduced from 10.27 to 6.18 kg/yr by disconnection alone — a reduction of approximately 40% — which may be sufficient to meet BMAP discharge load targets on some permitted sites.
- Both the connected-with-BMP and disconnected-with-BMP scenarios can meet performance criteria; the optimal approach depends on site constraints and the applicable load allocation in the BMAP.
- BMPFast reporting outputs should include surface discharge mass (kg/yr per pollutant) and surface discharge volume (acre-feet/yr or inches/yr) as the primary metrics for permit submittal.
Appendix · Quick-Reference Cards
Summary reference cards for field use, design review, and permit submittal preparation.
Ref Card 1 — DCIA Disconnection Standards
- HSG A/B: 10 ft minimum pervious flow path
- HSG C/D: 20 ft minimum pervious flow path
- Narrower width allowed via 3-yr/1-hr storm analysis
- Source: Applicant’s Handbook Vol. 1, 2024
Ref Card 2 — CN Storage Formula
- S′ = (1000/CN) − 10 (inches)
- CN=50 (HSG A): S′ = 10.00 in
- CN=78 (HSG C): S′ = 2.82 in
- CN=95 (Impervious): S′ = 0.53 in
- Compaction raises CN ~10 pts
Ref Card 3 — Composite CN Rules
- Always use volume-based composite CN
- Simple average (e.g., 86.5) underestimates runoff
- HSG A, 1.1 ac disconnected: CN = 83.81
- HSG C, 1.1 ac disconnected: CN = 91.26
- Sensitive to DCIA fraction and pervious area size
Ref Card 4 — Example Site Parameters
- Total impervious: 1.3 ac
- Disconnected: 1.1 ac | DCIA: 0.2 ac
- Pervious: 0.7 ac | HSG A, CN=50
- Rain garden: 0.15 ac, 2 ft Bold & Gold media
Ref Card 5 — BMPFast Results Summary
- Baseline (all DCIA): 28.24 in/yr, 10.27 kg TN/yr
- Disconnected, no BMP: 16.97 in/yr, 6.18 kg TN/yr
- Disconnected + rain garden: 1.91 in/yr
- Report: surface discharge mass & volume
Ref Card 6 — BMPFast Configuration Checklist
- ☐ Enter DCIA, disconnected, and pervious areas separately
- ☐ Assign correct CN to each area
- ☐ Set routing: disconnected → pervious buffer → outlet
- ☐ Place BMP in series at correct position
- ☐ Verify BMP media matches approved spec
- ☐ Run baseline and disconnected scenarios before BMP
Applicant’s Handbook Vol. 1, 2024 · Slides 1–15